Consonant Insertion Process in Tabrizi Dialect within Optimality Theory Framework

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student of Linguistics, Department of Linguistics, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Foreign Language Teaching, Mohaqheqh Ardabili University, Ardabil, Iran.

3 Professor, Department of Linguistics, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.

4 Professor, Department of Foreign Languages, Payame Noor University, Ardabil, Iran.

Abstract

This article examines the process of consonant epenthesis in Azerbaijani Turkish language (Tabrizi dialect) based on optimality theory (standard approach). To do this research 90 Turkish words and 50 borrowed words were collected from the speakers of this language. The purpose of the present study is to determine under what phonological conditions consonant, epenthesis takes place and what the active markedness constraints in explaining the mentioned process are. Data analysis shows that in this language, when adding a suffix consisting a (vowel) phoneme with [+high] vowel is inserted to stem or the preceding suffix, the consonant /n/ and when adding a (vowel) phoneme or several (a consonant + a vowel) phonemes is inserted with [-high] vowel to the stem or preceding suffix /j/ consonant. Analysis of data indicates that in the mentioned phonological conditions, when hiatus vowel occurrence, ONSET markedness dominates DEP reliability constraint, and the constraints introduced with a fixed rating can easily explain the consonant epenthesis process.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Bijankhan, M. (2005). Phonology optimality theory. Tehran: Samt (In Persian).
Casali, R.F. (1997). Vowel elision in hiatus contexts: Which vowels goes? Language, 73 (3), 493-533.
Everett, D. (1996). Prosodic levels and constraints in Banawá and Suruwahá. In D.L. Everett (Ed.), Optimality Theory and Arawan prosodic system. University of Pittsburgh.
Farzaneh, M.A. (1978). Basics of Azerbaijani grammar. Tehran: Farzaneh (In Persian).
Kager, R. (1999). Optimality theory. Cambridge University Press.
Kramer, M. (2003). Vowel harmony and correspondence theory. Belin: Mouton de Gruyter.
McCarthy, J. (2002). A thematic guide to optimality theory. Cambridge: Cambridge university Press.
McCarthy, J. (2008). Doing optimality theory applying theory to data. Cambridge: Blackwell.
McCarthy, J.J., & Prince, A. (1995): Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In L. Bateman, M. O’Keefe, E. Reilly, & A. Werle (Eds.), Papers in Optimality Theory III: University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers (University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics).
Nevins, A., & Chitoran, I. (2008). Phonological representations and the variable patterning of glides. Lingua, 118 (12), 1979-1997.
Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (1993). Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in Generative Grammar (Technical Report no. RuCCS-TR-2). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutger University Center for Cognitive Science.
Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (2004). Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in Generative Grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Razinejad, S.M., & Bijankhan, M. (2012). Conspiracy in Azarbaijani Turkish. Journal of Language Research, 3 (2), 43-56 (In Persian).
Spencer, A. (1996). Phonology: Theory & description.. Oxford: Blackwell.
Uffmann,C. (2011). Epenthetic vowel quality in loanwords: empirical and formal issues. Lingua 116. 1079-1111.
Vaux, B. (2001). Consonant epenthesis and hypercorrection. 75th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Washington, DC.
Zygis, M., (2010). Typology of consonantal insertions. Papers from the Linguistics Laboratory, 52, 111-140.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics