Tense and aspect in Kurdish

Document Type : Original Article

Author

assistant professor of linguistics at university of Kurdsitan

Abstract

The present paper aims at investigating the tense system and its relationship to the aspectual system in Mukriyan Kurdish language. For this purpose, we analyze the tense system in the Mukriyan Kurdish language, and then evaluate its influences on the grammatical and situational aspects. The results show that the Mukriyan Kurdish language has a binary tense system (past and non-past). The combination of this system with modal and aspectual markers gives rise to various conceptions of time that are not necessarily enjoying a grammatical coding. For example, the combination of this tense system with the mood markers gives birth to future and posterior times. Also, the results demonstrate that the present tense can be mainly combined with the imperfect aspect, whereas the past tense is the most unmarked tense for the perfect aspect. In addition, all the lexical aspects may easily be expressed in the past tense, but many of them suffer coercion in the present tense. It should be noted that expressing the perfect aspect in present tense is possible in some situations including imperative sentences and sport report.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

امینی، امیر (1377). تحقیقی پیرامون زبان کردی. تهران: هدف.
انجمن علمی کردی عراق (1976). دستور سخن کردی (به زبان کردی). بغداد: چاپخانة انجمن علمی عراق.
----------------- (1985). برخی از مشکلات نحو کردی (به زبان کردی). بغداد: چاپخانة انجمن علمی عراق.
کریمی دوستان، غلامحسین (1380). کردی ایلامی: بررسی گویش بدره. سنندج: انتشارات دانشگاه کردستان.
محوی، محمد (2011). مبانی نحو کردی (به زبان کردی). سلیمانیه: پیوند.
نبز، جمال (1976). زبان معیار کردی. بامبیرگ: اتحادیه دانشجویان کرد در اروپا.
Binnick, R. (1991). Time and the Verb. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
------------- (1985). Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Evans, V. (2005). The Structure of Time. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin.
-----------. (2013). Language and Time: A Cognitive Linguistic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hewson, J. & V. Bubenik (1997). Tense and Aspect in Indo-Europian Languages. John Benjamin: Amsterdam/Philadelphia.
Huddleston, R. & G. K. Pullum (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Klein, W. (1994). Time in Language. London: Routledge.
Langacker, R. W. (1982). Remarks on English Aspect. In. P. J. Hopper (Ed.), Tense-Aspect: Between Semantics and Pragmatics, (pp. 265-304). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin Publishing.
--------------------- (2008). Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford New York: Oxford University Press.
--------------------- (2011). The English Present: Temporal Coincidence vs. Epistemic Immediacy. In. A. Patard & F. Brisard (Eds.), Cognitive Approaches to Tense, Aspect, and Epistemic Modality, (pp. 45-86). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Radden, G. & R. Dirven (2007). Cognitive English Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Reichenbach, H. (1947). Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: The Macmillan Company.
Smith, C. S. (1997). The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Sohn, S-O. (1995). Tense and Aspect in Korean. Hawai: Center for Koreain Studies.
Vendler, Z. (1967). Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Xiao, R. & T. McEnery (2004). Aspect in Mandarin Chinese: A Corpus-Based Study. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Research in Western Iranian Languages and Dialects
Volume 2, Issue 8
April 2015
Pages 101-124

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics