On the Existence of Small Clause in Mokryani

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor/Razi University

2 Razi university

3 Assistant Professor of Linguistics, Razi Univrsety

Abstract

Small clause is considered as a constituent with [NP XP] structure which can appear as the argument of “consider-type” verbs. In some languages like French, Swedish, Arabic and Farsi the aforesaid chain makes a constituent called “Small Clause”, SC from now. As a matter of fact, since the appearance of the term SC in Linguistics by Williams (1974), a considerable number of studies have been devoted to investigate the constituency and categorical status of SCs. However, this topic is still controversial. SC complements are the structures with a subject NP and a predicate XP which have the clausal characteristics and predicative meaning. The XP can be a noun phrase, adjective phrase or a preposition phrase. The present study aims at providing some arguments on constituency of the chain [NP XP] as the complement of consider-type verbs in Mokryani Variant. Providing some arguments and diagnostic tests, this chain is proved to make a constituent in this variant. Consequently, the chain [NP XP], as the argument of consider-type verbs, makes a constituent called “Small Clause”.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

درزی، علی (1389). شیوۀ استدلال نحوی. تهران: سمت.
غلامعلی‌زاده، خسرو (1374). ساخت زبان فارسی. تهران: احیاء کتاب.
کلباسی، ایران (1362). گویش کردی مهاباد. تهران: مؤسسۀ مطالعات و تحقیقات فرهنگی.
Adger, D. (2002). Core Syntax a Minimalist Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Arts, B. (1992). Small Clauses in English: the Nonverbal Types. Topics in English Linguistics 8. Berlin and New York: Mpoton du Gruyter.
---------- (2001). English Syntax and Argumentation. Hampshire: Palgrave.
Baltin, M. (1998). A Non-argument for the Small Clauses as Constituents. Linguistics Inquiry, 29(3), 513-525.
Bhatt, R. (2005). Long Distance Agreement in Hindi- Urdu. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,23, 757-807.
Cardinaletti, A. and M. T. Guastis (1995). Syntax and Semantics: Small Clauses Vol. 28. London Academic Press.
Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of Language, its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger.
----------------- (1993). “A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory”. MIT Occasional Paper in Linguistics1, 1-52.
Crystal, D. (2003). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. Blackwell.
Darzi, A. (2006). “Small Clauses in Persian”. J. Humanities 13:1, 13-30.
Haegeman, L. (1994). Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Cambridge Mass: Blackwell.
----------------- (2006). Thinking Syntactically. Oxford: Blackwell Publisher.
----------------- and Jacqueline Guèron (1999). English Grammar, a Generative Perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hukari, T. and R. Levine (1991). On the Disunity of Unbounded Dependency Constructions. Natural Languages and Linguistic Theory 9, 27-144.
Irimia, M. A. (2012). Secondary Predicsate. Ph.D. Dissertation. Toronto University.
Napoli, D. J. (1993). Syntax: Theory and Problem. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pollard, C. and I. Sag (1994). Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar. CSLI Publications.
Radford, A. (1988). Transformational Grammar: A First Course. Cambridge University Press.
Rizzi, L. (1986). Null Object in Italian and Theory of Pro. Linguistic Inquiry, 17, 501-557.
Safir, K. (1983). On Small Clauses as Constituents. Linguistic Review, 2(3), 285-312.
Stowell, T. (1983). Subject across Categories. Linguistic Review, 2(3), 285-312.
---------------- (1991). Small Clause Restructuring. MIT Press.
Williams, E. (1983(. Against Small Clauses. Linguistics Inquiry, 14(2), 287-308.
Yokoyama, T. (2012). On the Existence of Small Clauses in Japanese. M.A. Thesis. University of Toronto.
Research in Western Iranian Languages and Dialects
Volume 6, Issue 20
March 2018
Pages 23-43

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics