Split Verb Phrase in Persian: The Distinctness of Voice and Little v

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Depatrtment of Linguistics, University of Tehran

2 University of Tehran

Abstract

In more than two decades, the conclusion that any verb phrase is made up of two projections, vP or voiceP and VP, has become standard among Chomskyan linguists. Recent studies, using split-vP hypothesis, however, suggest that VP can be decomposed into three layers: vP, voiceP and VP. In this hypothesis, voice is different from v: v represents the type of event, such as the causative event. On the other hand, voice introduces the external argument. VP is a projection in which the head is an acategorial root which can be categorized via its movement to v. Interaction of the causative morpheme and light verbs, in addition to introducing the external argument in complex predicates, in Persian, are some examples that challenge the bipartite verb phrase. This research aims to show, by studying causative constructions, that Persian verb phrases are tripartite, in which voice and v are different and independent.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

آهنگر، عباسعلی (1387). تحلیل پوسته‌ای گروه فعلی بر پایۀ برنامۀ کمینه‌گرا. زبان و زبان‌شناسی، 4 (7)، 1-25.
انوشه، مزدک (1394). مسئلۀ مجهول در زبان فارسی: رویکردی کمینه‌گرا. پژوهش‌های زبان‌شناسی، 6 (1)، 1-20.
درزی، علی و انوشه، مزدک (1389). حرکت فعل اصلی در فارسی: رویکردی کمینه‌گرا. زبان‌پژوهی، 2 (3)، صص. 21-55.
Baker, M.C. (1988). Incorporation. Chicago: CUP.
Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Folli, R. & H. Harley (2005). Flavors of v: Consuming Results in Italian and English. In: R. Slabakova & P. Kempchinsky (Eds.), Aspectual Inquiries, (pp. 95-120). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
-------------------------- & S. Karimi (2005). Determinants of Event Type in Persian Complex Predicates. Lingua, 115 (10), 1365-1401.
Hale, K. & S. J. Keyser (2002). Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Harley, H. (2009). The Morphology of Nominalizations and the Syntax of vP. In: M. Rathert, & A. Giannakidou (Eds.), Quantification, Definiteness, and Nominalization, (pp. 320-342). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
------------- (2013). External Arguments and the Mirror Principle: On the Distinctness of Voice and v. lingua, 125, 34-57.
------------- (2017). The “Bundling” Hypothesis and the Disparate Functions of Little v. In: R. D’Alessandro, I. Franco & A. J. Gallego (Eds.), The Verbal Domain, (pp. 3-28) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Karimi-Doostan, Gh. (2005). Light Verbs and Structural Case. Lingua, 115 (3), 1737-1756.
-------------------------- (2013). Voice and v: Evidence from Kurdish and Persian, Little v Conference, Leiden, https://linguistlist.org/issues/24/24-3089.
Key, G. (2013). The Morphosyntax of Turkish Causative Construction. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Linguistics. University of Arizona.
Kratzer, A. (1996). Severing the External Argument from its Verb. In: J. Rooryck & L. Zaring (Eds.), Phrase Structure, the Lexicon, (pp. 109-137). Dordrecht: Springer.
Megerdoomian, K. (2001). Event Structure and Complex Predicates in Persian. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 46 (1), 97-125.
Pylkkänen, L. (2002). Introducing Arguments. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Linguistics, Massauchussets Institute of Technology.
--------------------- (2008). Introducing Arguments. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Siddiqi, D. (2009). Syntax within the Word: Economy, Allomorphy and Argument Selection in Distributed Morphology, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Vahedi-Langrudi, M. (1996). The Syntax, Semantics and Argument Structure of Complex Predicates in modern Farsi. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of Ottawa.
Wood, J. & A. Marantz, (2017). The Interpretation of External Arguments. In: R. D’Alessandro, I. Franco & Á. Gallego (Eds.), The Verbal Domain. (pp. 255-298). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics