Investigation of Imperfect Aspect in Kurdish Dialect Based on Sign-base Construction Grammar

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 M.A. of Linguistics, University of Kurdistan, Iran

2 Assistant professor of Linguistics and English language, University of Kurdistan, Iran

3 Associate professor of Linguistics, University of Kurdistan, Iran

Abstract

The present study describes and specifies imperfect aspect in Sourani Kurdish dialect based on sign-based construction grammar. In this paper, firstly imperfective constructions are investigated, then their temporal representation is indicated in sign-based construction grammar. The investigations showed that imperfective constructions in Surani dialect include progressive construction, perfect, habitual, and present tense. Each of these constructions in some way makes events imperfect. In such a way that progressive construction focuses on their intermediate stage when applied to accomplishment and activity events; but highlights the middle phase of the beginning stage of achievement events. This construction also converses semelfactive verbs into a repetitive activity, then selects the middle stages of them. Habitual constructions make all verbs initially turn into repetitive activity, then highlight the middle stages among the events. On the other hand, perfect construction when combined with lexical situations chooses the final phase and thereby turning events into imperfect ones. The present tense also eliminates, in combination with different situations, the final transition or result of events, and represents only the middle stages of events.
 

Keywords

References

Bickel, B. (1997). Aspectual scope and the difference between logical and semantic representation. Lingua, 102 (2-3), 115-131.
Carnie, A. (2013). Syntax: A generative introduction. John Wiley & Sons.
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems (Vol. 2). Cambridge university press.
Frawley, W. (1992). Linguistic semantics. New York and London: Routledge.
Langacker. W. R. (2008). Cognitive Grammar: an Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Michaelis, L. A. (2004). Type shifting in construction grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive linguistics, 15 (1), 1-68.
Sag, I. A., T. Wasow & E. M. Bender (2003). Syntactic Theory: A Formal Introduction. Stanford: CSLI Publications, second edition.
------------ (2007). Sign-based construction grammar: An informal synopsis. Stanford University.
------------ (2012). Sign-based construction grammar: An informal synopsis. Sign-based construction grammar, 193, 69-202.
Saussure, F. D. (1916).Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.
Smith, C. (1997). The parameter of aspect. 2nd. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Vendler, Z. (1967). Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Verkuyl, H. J. (1993). A theory of Aspectuality: The interaction between temporal and atemporal structure (Vol. 64). Cambridge University Press.
Research in Western Iranian Languages and Dialects
Volume 3, Issue 13
August 2016
Pages 105-126

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics