Phonotactics in the Turkish Language

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Linguistics, Department of English Language and Linguistics, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Linguistics, Department of Persian Language and Literature, Faculty of Letters, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to explore the phonotactic structure of the Turkish phonological system on the basis of an extensive Turkish linguistic corpus. In a descriptive study, the distribution of Turkish consonants in onset and coda positions as well as consonantal sequences across syllable boundary (in c.c) and coda clusters (in cvcc syllable were examined. Results showed that stops and affricates in syllable onset position are most frequent, which is in line with the hierarchy of sonority scale assumed by the constraint *ONSET/X (Selkirk, 1984). Furthermore, the study of sound sequences in various syllable structures revealed that sonorants are more frequent than stops in coda position (in cvc), and also closer to syllable head than stops in coda clusters (in cvcc). This finding contradicts the predictions assumed by the constraint *CODA/X. Further results indicated that the distribution of Turkish consonants in coda clusters (in cvcc) are in conformity with the Sonority Sequencing Principle with the least marked phonotactic structure. However, the distribution of consonants across syllable boundary (in c.c) involves various consonantal sequences including those which belong to the same or similar natural class of consonants.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Bijankhan, M. (2015). Phonology: Optimality theory. Tehran: Samt (In Persian).## Goldsmith, J. (1976). Autosegmental phonology. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Repr. By Indiana University Linguistics Club.##Greenberg, Joseph H. (1950). The patterning of root morphemes in Semitic. WORD. Routledge. 6:2, 162-181,## Kenstowicz, M. (1994). Syllabification in Chukchee: a constraint-based analysis. Rutgers Optimality Archive 30. (1996). Quality-sensitive stress. Rivista di Linguistica 9:157–87 [also Rutgers Optimality Archive 33].##McCarthy, J. & A. Prince (1988). Quantitative Transfer in Reduplicative and Templatic Morphology. In Linguistic Society of Korea. Ed. Linguistics in the Morning Calm 2. Hanshin Publishing Co. Seoul. Pp. 3-35.## McCarthy, J. (1986). OCP effects: gemination and antigemination. Linguistic Inquiry 17, 207-263.McCarthy, John. To appear. A case of surface constraint violation. Canadian Journal of Linguistics. Special issued edited by Carole Paradis. Darlene LaCharité. And Emmanuel Nikiema.## Prince, A. & P. Smolensky (1993). Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Ms., Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N.J. and University of Colorado, Boulder. [To appear, MIT Press.]
##
Roca I. & W. Johnson (1999). A course in phonology. Oxford & Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers. Pp. xxi+725.
##
Samareh, Y. (2001). Persian phonetics: Sounds and the Syllable Structure of the Sounds. Tehran: Iran University Press. (In Persian).
##
Selkirk, E. (1984). Phonology and Syntax: the Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.
##
Smith, J. L. (2003). Onset sonority constraints and syllable structure. ROA 608.
##
Smolensky, P. (1993). Harmony, markedness, and phonological activity. Revised handout of a paper presented at the Rutgers Optimality Workshop 1, New Brunswick, N. J. [Rutgers Optimality Archive 37.]
##

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics