Conceptualization of Motion in Persian Compound Verbs: A Cognitive Approach

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student of Linguistics, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Associate Professor of Linguistics, Department of Linguistics, Tarbiat-e-Modaress University, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Professor of Linguistics, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad. University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Motion is considered as a fundamental concept in human cognitive system that could be represented in all languages differently. The present paper is going to explain that how lexicalization happens in motion compound verbs. This research is analytical descriptive, and is going to study the lexical meaning of the none-verbal elements and main verb elements such as (do, give, become, hit, eat, go, take, come, pull) according to Talmy’s theory(1985) ,and to find the amount of lexicalization of these verbs in Persian language which is divided into verb-framed and satellite-framed combined verbs. Another aim is to show the semantic meaning between its constructions. Thus, 100 combined verbs collected as non-head framed construction which consisted of mentioned verbs from Fargang-e-Sokhan (Anvari,1381). The results indicate that lexicalization happens both in root and satellite. It also shows that the meaning components of each head framed construction causes that special satellite accompanied with the mentioned verbs, thus the more fertility in satellite, the more lexicalization. Other results show that Persian compound verbs are more satellite-framed than verb-framed. Another result shows that according to Slobin’s theory (1960), speakers of verb-based languages as persian languags languages tend to remove the component of path in sentences.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Alhamdan, B., Alenazi, O., & Zouheir A. Maalej (2018). Motion verbs in Modern Standard Arabic and their implications for Talmy’s lexicalization patterns. Language Sciences, 69, 43-56.
Azkiya, N. (2011). Motion in persian language based on cognitive  and typological approach. Ph.D. Dissertation in Linguistics, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Science and Reseaech Branch (In Persian).
Azkiya, N., & Sasani, F. (2012). Lexicalization of motion event in Persian: A new Pattern. Language and Linguistics, 8 (15), 83-104 (In Persian).
Azkia, N., Sasani, F., & Afrashi. A. (2015). Lexicalization as a framework for explaining non-simple verbs in Persian. ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research), 7 (14), 31-57 (In Persian).
Anvari, H. (2002). Farhang-e- Sokhan (8th ed.). Tehran: Sokhan (In Persian).
Babaee, H. (2011). Lexicalization of motion event in Persian. Theory and practice in language studies, 1 (2),157-162.
Berman, R., & Slobin, D.L. (1994). Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. New York: Routledge.
Dabir Moghadam, M. (1995). Compound verb in Persian Language. Journal of Linguistics, 12 (1&2), 2-45 (In Persian).
Eslamipour, N. & Sharafzadeh, M.H. (2019). Comparison of motion verbs in Persian and Englisg Language: A cognitive and typological approach. ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research), 11 (31), 223-264 (In Persian).
Evans, V., & Melanie, G. (2006). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburg University Press.
Ferez, P.C. (2008). Motion in English and Spanish: A perspective from cognitive linguistics, typology and psycholinguistics, Ph.D. Thesis. Universidad de Murcia, Spain.
Folli, R., Harly, H., & Karimi, S. (2005). Determinants of event types in Persian Complex Predicates. Lingua, 115 (10), 1365-1401.
Geeraerts, D. (1988). Cognitive grammar and the history of lexical semantics. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics in Cognitive Linguistics (PP. 647-77). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Golfam, A., Afrashi, A. & Moghadam, Gh. (2014). Conceptualization of the Persian simple verbs of motion: A cognitive approach. Research in Western Iranian Languages and Dialects, 1 (3), 122-130 (In Persian).
Hamedi Shirvani, Z., & Sharifi, Sh. (2014). A typological analysis of satellite in the event structure of motion in Persian language. Language Related Research, 5 (2), 71-89 (In Persian).
Iranloo, H. (2008). A research on difficulties of learning motion verbs of Russian language for Persian learners. Journal of Language and Literature Faculty of Letters and Humanities, 41 (2), 29-58 (In Persian).
Langacker, R. (1987). Foundation of cognitive grammar (Vol. 1). Stanford University Press.
Lestrad, S., & Reshöft, N. (2012). Towards a revision of the typology of motion Verbs. In C. Stachniss, K. Schill, & D. Uttal (Eds.), Spatial Cognitions VIII: International Conference, Spatial Cognition 2012, Kloster Seeon, Germany, August 31 – September 3, 2012 Proceedings (PP. 230-241). Springer.
Levin, B., Rappaport Hovav, M. (1992). The Lexical Semantics of verbs of motion: A Perspective from unaccusativity. In I.M. Roca (ed.), Thematic Structure: Its Role in Grammar (PP. 247-269). Foris, Berlin.
Mesgar-e-khoee. Maryam.(2012). Representation of motion events in Persian language. In M. Dabir Moghadam (Ed.), A cognitive Approach. 8th Linguistics Conference (pp. 1-28). Tehran: Allame Tbatabaee (In approach).
Mirkhaled, F., & Hosomi, V. (2018). Analysis of the functioning of motion verbs
in the Holy Quran with a cognitive approach. Bi-quarterly Journal of Quran and Hadith Studies, 12 (2), 103-133 (In Persian).
Shahhosseini, F., Roushan, B., Sabouri, N. & Najafiyan, A. (2018). Transitivity of motion verbs in Persian language. Language Related Research, 8 (7),.117-136 (In Persian).
Slobin, D.I. (1960). Relation between paths of motion and paths of vision: A crosslinguistic and developmental exploration. In V. M.  Mueller Gathercole (Ed.), Routes to Language: Studies in Honor of Melissa Bowerman (pp. 197-221). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language Typology And the Syntactic Description (PP. 36-149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Talmy, L. (2000a). Toward a Cognitive Semantics (vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Talmy, L. (2000b). Toward a Cognitive Semantics, (vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.