The Relationship between Grammatical and Lexical Aspects: a Study on the Compositional Theory

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Linguistics, Department of Persian Language and Literature, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Persian Literature, Department of Persian Language and Literature, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

This article studies the relationship between grammatical and lexical aspects based on the compositional theory. The data of this study was collected from written and spoken contemporary Persian. The data indicates no one-to-one correspondence between grammatical and lexical aspects. The unbound action events are atelic while the bound ones have telic/ atelic features. The mismatch between grammatical and lexical aspects of state propositions is based on perfect or progressive interpretation of grammatical aspect and atelic feature of lexical aspect. The normal stative happenings have perfect/ progressive grammatical and atelic lexical aspects while the achievement state sentences have telic aspects. There is no one-to-one correspondence between perfect and telic aspects as well as progressive and atelic aspects in accomplishment propositions. The perfect grammatical aspects of accomplishment propositions have telic features. The durative accomplishment events show approaching to the endpoint. The grammatical aspects have an influence on lexical aspects in these events. Perfect grammatical aspects of scalar accomplishment events possess telic/ atelic lexical aspects. The lexical aspect of events is not predictable and it is not determined through inherent features of verbs, but all constituents have an effect on specifying it.

Keywords


Abolhasani Chime, Z. (2004). Aspectual verbs. In A. Kazemi (Ed.) Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on Linguistics (pp. 25-33). Tehran: Allame Tabatab'I University Publication.)In Persian(.
Anvari, H, (2007). Farhang-i buzurg-i Sukhan (2nd ed.). Tehran: Soxan Pbulication (In Persian).
Borik, O. (2006). Aspect and reference time (No. 13). Oxford University Press on Demand.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1986). Barriers. Cambridge/Mass.: The MIT Press.
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems (Vol. 2). Cambridge university press.
Comrie, B. (1985). Tense (Vol. 17). Cambridge University Press.
Comrie, B. (1989). Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. University of Chicago press.
Croft, W. (2012). Verbs: aspect and causal structure. Oxford: University Press.
Dastlan, M., Mohammadebrahimi, Z., Mehdi Beyraghdar, R., & Rovshan, B. (2016). Aspect in Persian; a new perspective based on the Cognitive Metaphorical Extension Approach and aspectual features. Language Related Rrsearch, 7 (3), 69-86 (In Persian).
Declerck, R. (2007). Distinguishing between the aspectual categories '(a)telic', '(im)perfective' and '(non)bounded'. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 29 : pp. 48-64. DOI: 10.17161/KWPL.1808.1787
Dowty, D. (1979).Word Meaning and Montague Grammar, Dordrecht: Reidel.
Emonds, J. (1972). Evidence that indirect object movement is a structure-preserving rule. Foundations of language 8, (pp. 546-561). In M.Gross, M.Halle and M.P. Schutzenbergereds (Eds.), The formal analysis of natural languages. The Hague: Mouton.
Filip, H. (1999). Aspect, eventuality types and noun phrase semantics. New York, 81-149.
Ghonchepoor, M. (2020). Aspect in synthetic compounds: A corpus-based study. Language Science, 7 (11), 45-80. doi: 10.22054/ls.2020.44566.1250, )In Persian).
Golfam, A. (2006). Principles of language grammar. Tehran: SAMT. )In Persian(.
Hay, J., C. Kennedy, and B. Levin. (1999). Scalar structure underlies telicity in ‘degree achievements’. In Proceedings of SALT 9, Ed. Tanya Matthews and Devon Strolovitch,127-44. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, CLC Publications.
Krifka, M. (1989). Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. Semantics and contextual expression, 75, 115.
Krifka, M. (2001). ‘‘The mereological approach to aspectual composition’’, handout of thetalk given at the conference ‘Perspectives on Aspect’, University of Utrecht, December12-14. Available at http://amor.rz.hu-berlin.de/ h2816;3x/’’.
Levin, B. (2007). The lexical semantics of verbs II: Aspectual approaches to lexical semantic representation [PDF document]. Retrieved from http://www.stanford. edu/~bclevin/lsa07asp.pdf.
Li, P. & Shirai, Y. (2000). The acquisition of lexical and grammatical aspect. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
MacDonald, J. E. (2008). Domain of aspectual interpretation. Linguistic Inquiry, 39 (1), 128-147.
Majidi, M. (2009). Features and Functions of aspect in Persian. Persian Language and Literature Research, 15, 145-158 (In Persian).
Naghzgooy Kohan, M. (2011). Modal verbs and the concept of exponence in Persian. Journal of Adab Pazhuhi, 4 (14), 93-110 (In Persian).
Nurse, D. (2008). Tense and Aspect in Bantu. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rothstein, S. (2004). Structuring events. Oxford: Blackwell.
Rothstein, S. (2008). Verb classes and aspectual classification. Structuring Events: A Study in the Semantics of Lexical Aspect, 1-35. Oxford: Blackwell.
Smith, C. (1991/1997). The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Tenny, C. L. (1994). Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface (Vol. 52). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Vendler, Z. (1967). Verbs and times. Linguistics in philosophy. Z. Vendler, 97-121. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
Verkuyl, H. J. (1972). On the Compositional Nature of the Aspects. Foundations of Language, Supplementary Series, 15, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Verkuyl, H. J. (1993). A Theory of Aspectuality: The interaction between Temporal and Atemporal Structure. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 64.
Verkuyl, H. J. (1998). ‘Tense, aspect and aspectual composition’ in UiL OTS Working Papers, February.
Verkuyl, H. J. (2012). Compositionality. In R. I. Binnick. The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect. (pp. 536-562). Oxford: Oxford University Press.