Social Semiotics of Kermanshahi Jalili's Ashura Book Ser al Asrar from the Point of View of Pir Girou

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.

2 Ph.D., Department of Persian Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

Abstract

The approach of social semiotics is one of the prominent sub-branches in the science of semiotics, which reveals the meanings hidden in them by explaining the signs. This approach is based on the three domains of identity codes, signs of social etiquette and the nature of social signs. Since the obituary is a historical and realistic narrative, it has a lot of capacity to examine semiotics, especially with a social approach. The purpose of this research is to introduce an original and little-known Muqtali, in which valuable information can be obtained from the context of the Umayyad society by analyzing codes and social signs. This article tries to identify the semiotics of one of the original murders in the west of Iran in a descriptive-analytical way, and for this purpose, it has used the social semiotics approach of Pierre Giruo. This book is called Siral-Asrar Fi Misibeh Abi al-Imam al-Athar (AS) from the famous Ashura historiography and the work of Ayatollah Jalili Kermanshahi. The findings show that the author revealed the political, economic, social and cultural issues of the Umayyad period and the Ashura event using social symbols and codes, and at the same time expressed her views and ideologies. These signs depict the beliefs, ignorance of the people of the society, poverty of thought, rule of terror, hypocrisy and hypocrisy, violence and oppression, corruption of rulers and governors, etc. in the Umayyad society

Keywords


Abrams, M. H., & Harpham, G. (2009). A Glossary of literary terms. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Akbarizadeh, M. (2021). Analysis of identity functions of language in praise poems. Poetry Study, 14(1), 1-21 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22099/jba.2021.39346. 3943
Allen, G. (2006). Roland Barthes (P. Yazdanjo, Trans.). Tehran: Nashere Markaz (In Persian).
Braheni, R. (1938). Story writing (1st printing). Tehran: Nashre Now (In Persian).
Chaili, S. (2005). Identity and language (1st ed.). Tabriz: Akhtar (In Persian).
Saussure, F. de (1999). General linguistics course (K. Safavi , Trans.). Tehran: Hermes (In Persian).
Eagleton, T. (1996). Literary theory: An introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Eco, U. (2008). Semiotics (P. Izaidi, Trans.). Tehran: Sales (In Persian).
Gary (2003). Dictionary of literary terms (M. Sharifzadeh, Trans.). Tehran: Research Institute of Humanities & Cultural Studies. (In Persian).
Giro, P. (1392). Semiotics (M. Nabavi, Trans.). Tehran: Aghah.
Hadi Manesh, A. (2004). Flags & flags from Jahilit to Ashura. Mobaleghan, 6(63), 39-55 (In Persian).
Jalili Kermanshahi, A. A., & Jalili Kermanshahi, M. H. (n.d.). Ser al-Asrar Fi Misibah Abi al-Imam al-Athar (AS). Kermanshah: Shiftegan Kamal Institute (In Persian).
Javadi, S., Jahan Bakhat, L., & Sha'abani, O. (2021). Representation of the signs of Islamic identity in the novel al-Rajjol al-Dhi Aman based on social semiotics of Pierre Giraud. Sociology of art & literature, 13(1), 207-229 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22059/JSAL.2021.318261.665976
Koen, B. (2009). An introduction to sociology (M. Salasi, Trans.). Tehran: Totia (In Persian).
Makarik (2013). Encyclopedia of contemporary literary theories (M. Mohajer & M. Nabavi, Trans.). Tehran: Aghah (In Persian).
Naqabi, E., & Akbari, M. (2020). Socio-cultural analysis of Haj Sayyah's travelogue based on Pierre Girau's theory of semiotics. Persian Language & Literature, 28(88), 303-323 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.29252/jpll.28.88.303
Nazari, A., Khalili, P., & Bavan Pouri, M. (2019). Investigating the process of social semiotics in Nahj al-Balagheh based on identity & etiquette. Alavi research paper, 10(1), 215-237 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.30465/alavi.2019.4260
Nazari Tarhan, L., & Sabri, K. (2017). Semiotic analysis of children's book images based on social semiotics approach: A case study of the first grade Persian book. Research in Western Iranian Languages and Dialects, 5(19). 119-140 (In Persian).
Pierce, C. S. (2002). Logic as semiotics: The theory of signs (F. Sojodi, Trans.). Aesthetics,4(6), 51-64 (In Persian).
Ricoeur, P. (2007). Life in the world of text: Six conversations, one discussion. Translated by BaBak Ahmadi. Tehran: Tehran: Markaz (In Persian).
Sepehri, Mohammad (2006). Social classes in the Umayi period. Faculty of Literature & Human Sciences, 12(180), 75-94 (In Persian).
Shamisa, S. (2004). Expression. Tehran: Mitra (In Persian).
Sojudi (2009). Semiotics: theory & practice. Tehran: Nashre Elm.(In Persian).
Subhany, J. (2001). mawsueat tabaqat alfuqaha'. allajnat aleilmiat fi muasasat al'iimam alsaadiq. altabeat al'uwlaa, qim, muasasat al'iimam alsaadiq (In Persian).
Zavarghi, R., Vosough Zade, F., & Atapour, H. (2021). Review & evaluation of children's picture books related to the Imams of the Innocents & religious figures based on the social semiotics approach. Librarianship & information, 24(95), 113-137 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.30481/LIS.2019.187408.1584