Studying Speakers' Attitudes towards Kurdish, Kermanshahi Persian, and Standard Persian in Kermanshah Using Matched Guise Technique

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Master of Arts in Linguistics, Department of English Language & Linguistics, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Linguistics, Department of English Language & Linguistics, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.

3 Associate Professor of TESOL, Department of English Language & Linguistics, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

Abstract

We live in a world where linguistic diversity is rapidly dwindling. Many living languages are expected to become extinct during the next century. The speakers' attitude toward vernacular languages is the most crucial factor influencing a language's survival or death. Kermanshah, located in western Iran, is a multilingual city that speaks Kurdish, Kermanshahi Persian, and Standard Persian. In such societies, evaluating the linguistic attitude of a society's people toward a language variety and its speakers can provide insight into the future survival or decline of language types. To present an accurate and scientific image of the state and situation of these linguistic varieties, the Matched-guise test, one of the indirect ways of evaluating language attitude, was utilized in this study. Purposive sampling was used to select 80 participants, including 40 women and 40 males from Kermanshah aged 20 to 40 and 40 to 60, respectively. The results revealed that, in that order, Standard Persian, Kurdish, and Kermanshahi Persian had the highest to lowest positive attitudes. Women favored Standard Persian over men, whereas men favored Kurdish over Standard Persian. When the effect of age on linguistic attitude was evaluated, no significant difference was observed.
Introduction
Language plays a vital role in human personal and social lives, shaping beliefs, emotions, and attitudes towards mother tongue and other languages. Linguistic attitude, defined as emotional disposition towards languages (Crystal, 1997), can lead individuals to prefer one language over another due to various social, cultural, economic, historical, and identity factors. This preference can impact language survival or decline, with attitudes towards vernacular languages crucial for their preservation. Kermanshah, a city in western Iran with speakers of Kurdish, Kermanshahi Persian, and Standard Persian, exemplifies this dynamic, where assessing linguistic attitudes influences the preservation or marginalization of languages within the community.
Generally, to assess speakers' attitudes towards different language varieties, direct or indirect methods are used. However, there is a limited number of studies conducted within Iran that employ direct or indirect methods to gauge speakers' linguistic attitudes. In most studies conducted in Iran, the focus has predominantly been on the status and use of language varieties within various linguistic communities. The only internal study that employed an indirect method and Matched Guise Test is the study by Pirouzfar and Eliasi (2014). In contrast to internal studies, foreign studies mostly rely on indirect methods and utilize Matched Guise Test. Lambert's Matched Guise Test, introduced in 1960, gauges attitudes toward language variations in bilingual groups. Participants hear recordings of the same speaker using different accents or styles and rate their personality, social status, and other traits, revealing how language impacts social perceptions.
Methodology
The study utilized the Matched-Guise Test to investigate the status and dynamics of Kurdish, Kermanshahi Persian, and Standard Persian in Kermanshah. A purposive sampling method was employed to select 80 participants, evenly distributed between genders and age groups (20-40 and 40-60). Data collection involved a proficient speaker recording passages in each language variety, using a neutral tone to prevent bias. The passages were excerpts from "The Selfless Farmer," lasting approximately two minutes each. Participants listened to the recordings and answered 12 questions afterward.
Results
The findings of this study indicate that multilingual speakers residing in the city of Kermanshah have different language attitudes towards three common language varieties, namely Kurdish, Kermanshahi Persian, and Standard Persian. The average language attitude scores were 2.741 for Standard Persian, 2.613 for Kurdish, and 2.484 for Kermanshahi Persian, respectively. In this order, Standard Persian, Kurdish, and Kermanshahi Persian had the highest to lowest positive attitudes. Women favored Standard Persian over men, whereas men favored Kurdish over Standard Persian. When the effect of age on linguistic attitude was evaluated, no significant difference was observed.
Discussion and Conclusion
Attitude towards Standard Persian: The research findings show that multilingual speakers in Kermanshah have a more positive attitude towards Standard Persian, with an average language attitude of 2.741. Persian has held a prominent position as the lingua franca in Iran since the Saffarid Iranian dynasty. This status has been reinforced by Persian's role as the language of education, media, and government in contemporary times. The longstanding historical and contemporary significance of Persian as the national intermediary and official language in Iran helps explain the favorable attitude towards it among multilingual speakers in Kermanshah.
     Attitude towards Kurdish: In recent years, there has been a shift in attitudes towards Kurdish language, with it being viewed more positively after Standard Persian. This change is attributed to an increasing focus on ethnic identity and local languages, particularly in regions where non-Persian-speaking groups are predominant. Historically, local languages were seen as barriers to progress, leading to their neglect and eventual replacement by Persian. However, there's now a growing pride and awareness among speakers of indigenous languages, leading to efforts to preserve their linguistic heritage. This signifies a shift from past attitudes towards greater recognition and appreciation of linguistic diversity.
     Attitudes towards Kermanshahi Persian: The average language attitude towards Kermanshahi Persian is lower compared to Standard Persian and Kurdish. Kermanshahi Persian, recognized as a dialect of the Persian language, exhibits differences in various linguistic aspects from Standard Persian. Recent decades have seen a decline in its significance, marked by a decrease in its speaker population. Factors contributing to this decline include the Iraq-Iran War, which prompted migration, and the increasing dominance of Standard Persian in practical domains within Kermanshah. These reasons collectively contribute to the diminished status of Kermanshahi Persian, resulting in a less favorable language attitude when compared to Standard Persian and Kurdish.
     Language attitude and gender: Research indicates that women and men exhibit different language preferences and choices, with women often favoring standard and prestigious languages or varieties, while men lean towards indigenous varieties. This behavior is attributed to societal power dynamics and historical discrimination against women, leading them to adopt standard language varieties to improve their social status. In multilingual societies, women tend to gravitate towards "correct" or "prestigious" linguistic forms, reflecting their efforts to escape social inequalities. This gender difference in language attitudes was evident in the study, where men showed a more positive attitude towards Kurdish, while women favored Standard Persian (Tehran Persian), indicating significant differences based on gender.
     Language attitude and age: The study explores the relationship between language attitude and age, noting that behavioral patterns, including linguistic behavior, vary among age groups in human societies. Research across linguistic communities indicates that speakers exhibit distinct linguistic behavior at different ages, with patterns evolving throughout life. However, when evaluating the impact of age on linguistic attitude in this study, no significant difference was observed.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects


Baker, C. (1992). Attitudes and language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Bonher, G., & Wanke, M. (2002). Attitudes and attitude change. East Sussex: Psychology Press.
Chegeni, M. (2014). Researching the perspective of Lori dialect based on the attitude of Lori speaking male and female students towards it. National Conference of Third Millennium and Human Sciences. Shiraz. (In Persian)
Cook, V. J. (2003). Effects of the second language on the first. multilingula matters.
Crystal, D. (1997). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (4th ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Downes, W. (1984). Language and society (2nd ed.). UK: Cambridge University press.
Ghafarsamar, R. (2018). Basics of sociology of language (2nd ed.). Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University.
Giles, H., & Niedzielski, N. (1998). Italian is beautiful, German is ugly. In L. Bauer & P. Trudgill (Eds.), Language Myth (pp. 85-93). London: Penguin Books.
Holmes, J. )2013(. An introduction to sociolinguistics (4th ed.). London: Routledge.
Kircher, R. (2009). Language attitudes in Quebec: A contemporary perspective. School of Languages, Linguistics and Film: Queen Mary, University of London.
Lambert, W. E. (1967). A social psychology of bilingualism. Journal of Social Issues, 23(2), 91-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1967.tb00578.x
Meyerhoff, M. (2011). Introducing sociolinguistics. New York: Routledge
Modarresi, Y (2014). Language and immigration. Tehran: Research Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies.
Obiols, M. S. (2002). The matched guise technique: A critical approximation to a classic test for formal measurement of language attitudes. Noves SL. Revista de Sociolingüística 1. Teoria i metodologia. Estiu 2002.
Oranski, I. M. (1977). Les languesIraniennes, traduit par Joyce Blau. Paris Librairie C. Klincksieck.
Pantos, A., & Perkins, A. W. (2012). Measuring implicit and explicit attitudes toward foreign accented speech. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32(1), 3–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 0261927X12463005
Pirozfar, M., & Eliasi, M. (2013). Investigating the cognitive and emotional attitudes of Kurdish-Persian bilinguals towards Standard Persian based on the approach of subjectivity. Research in Western Iranian Languages and Dialects, 2(6), 27-46. (In Persian)
Rice, Philip (1922). Human Development, Psychology from Birth to Death (Translated by Mahshid Foroughan (1387), second edition. Tehran: Arjmand. (In Persian)
Sarli, N. Q. (2008). Standard Persian language (1st ed.). Tehran: Hermes. (In Persian)
Sarnoff, I. (1970). Social attitudes and the resolution of motivational conflict. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Soukup, B. (2001). Language attitudes in the United States towards Southern American English. PhD Thesis, Vienna: University of Vienna.
Wardhaugh, R. (2006). An introduction to sociolinguistics (5th ed.). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Weisi, H. (2020). A critical review of Kurdish language branches based on geographical residency. Journal of Kurdish Literature, 5(2), 125-140. (In Persian) doi: 10.34785/J013.2020.619