The Role of Metaphors in Shaping the Culture of Corona Fear: A Cognitive and Critical Approach

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The break out and spread of the new corona virus known as Covid-19, which has affected various dimensions of life in human societies from the beginning of 2020, has also attracted great media attention and has led to the emergence of discourses shaped based on metaphor. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the role of conceptual metaphors in creating a culture of fear in the discourses about Corona in the domestic Persian-language press. The research data consists of metaphorical expressions from the headlines or news texts of Hamshahri newspaper which conceptualized the coronavirus using the domain of war. These metaphorical expressions (N=350) were obtained by keywords search method (such as Corona, Covid, Covid-19, virus, epidemic). The data have been analyzed based on conceptual metaphor Theory (Lakoff and Johnson, 1980) and within the framework of the critical metaphor analysis (Charteris-Black, 2004). The results of the research demonstrate that the conceptual metaphor "Corona is an enemy" with its numerous associations regarding the domain of war leads to the promotion and strengthening of the culture of fear in the discourse of Corona. In this regard, the argumentative and emotional functions of metaphors play a key role and both serve the persuasive function
Introduction
The emergence and spread of the new coronavirus known as COVID-19, which has affected various aspects of life in human societies since early 2020, has also been widely reflected in various media around the world and has led to the emergence of discourses, a significant portion of which is based on metaphor. Our aim in this research is to examine the role of conceptual metaphors in creating a culture of fear in the discourse surrounding the coronavirus with a cognitive and critical approach. The research, based on Conceptual Metaphor Theory (Lakoff, 1993; Lakoff & Johnson, 1980, 1999) and within the framework of critical metaphor analysis (Charteris-Black, 2004), seeks to answer two fundamental questions: 1. How do metaphors contribute to the formation of a culture of fear regarding the coronavirus? 2. What function do metaphors play in shaping COVID-19 discourse and the culture of fear?
Since the appearance of COVID-19 and its global spread, studies have been conducted on various dimensions of the disease. Linguistic researchers have also studied the conceptualization of the disease and its reflection in media. Mozaheb and Shahiditabar (2020) have found that the most common source domains used in Iranian online media for conceptualizing the coronavirus are: enemy, barrier, path, movement, crisis, fortress, physical experiences, and body parts. Yalsharzeh and Monsefi (2020) have found that the Ministry of Health in Iran has used Concepts based on the religious-revolutionary ideology and the Iran-Iraq war to confront the coronavirus. Javid and Rahimian (2021) have examined the differences in the metaphorical conceptualization of the coronavirus in the headlines of two Iranian newspapers, Etemad and Iran, and found that metaphorical domains such as vehicle, human, animal, disaster, obstacle, sword, object, commodity, competition, living being, force, place, war, event, game, and opportunity were common in both newspapers. At the global level, numerous studies have been conducted on the linguistic dimensions of the coronavirus discourse. Wicke and Bolognesi (2020) have examined the conceptualization of the coronavirus and the discussion of its pandemic on Twitter and found that the words and terms related to the "war" conceptual domain play a significant role in shaping the discourse of the coronavirus. Chaiuk and Dunaievska (2020) have shown that British newspapers, using metaphorical interpretations, have depicted the coronavirus as a deadly creature which is approaching Britain and will engulf the country like a tsunami.
Methodology
The research data consists of excerpts from the titles or texts of news published on the Hamshahri newspaper's website during a four-month period from the beginning of February 2020 to the end of June 2020, in which the coronavirus has been conceptualized by war metaphors. These metaphorical expressions, obtained through keyword search (such as corona, COVID, COVID-19, virus, pandemic), amount to 350 cases and have been analyzed based on Conceptual Metaphor Theory (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980) and within the framework of critical metaphor analysis (Charteris-Black, 2004).
Results
The research findings indicate that the conceptual domain of war is one of the most commonly used metaphorical domains to describe the coronavirus. In the discourse of the Hamshahri newspaper, the conceptual metaphor ‘corona is the enemy’ has played a central and fundamental role in conceptualizing the coronavirus and related issues and events. This conceptual metaphor entails multiple metaphorical implications, including the following:
- Medical centers are the front line of the war against the enemy;
- Medical staff (doctors, nurses, etc.) are the soldiers (fighters, warriors);
- The highest responsible authority is the commander of the war;
- Medical interventions and activities are military operations;
- Recovery from the coronavirus is defeating the enemy.
Discussion and Conclusion
In response to the first question, it must be said that metaphors always highlight some aspects of reality while hide others. What is highlighted in the metaphors of war is the critical nature of the conditions and the intensity of the existential damage that is inflicted on society. Additionally, the necessity of unity and earnest effort to combat the disease is another aspect that is highlighted in this metaphor. Therefore, war metaphors make the audience feel so fearful and anxious that they perceive their ordinary and daily life as a dangerous battle with a deadly enemy, which they may encounter at any time and place.
In response to the second question, it should be noted that war metaphors have both cognitive and persuasive functions and, in addition to rationality, they influence the emotions of the audience. The metaphor 'Coronavirus is the enemy' uses various concepts from the war domain, which is a familiar and experienced concept for Iranians, and by employing religious elements that are also prevalent in the discourse of imposed war (such as martyrdom, sacrifice, jihad), it serves the dual functions of argumentation and emotion, accompanying the rationality and emotions of the audience.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects


Altheide, D. L. (2002). Creating fear, news and the construction of crisis. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
Chaiuk, T. A., & Dunaievska, O. V. (2020). Producing the fear culture in media: An examination on coronavirus discourse. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 9(2), 184-194. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v9i2.2636
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chilton, P., & Lakoff, G. (1995). Foreign policy by metaphor. In C. Schaffner and A Wenden (Eds.), Language and Peace (pp. 37-60). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Daneshzadeh, S. (2020). From the metaphors for corona to metaphorical corona: On the necessity of revisiting construals surrounding Covid-19. Conference on Human-social dimensions of the Corona in Iran. Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian)
Gibbs, R. W. (2006). Metaphor: Psychological aspects. In J. L. Mey (Ed.) (2009), Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics (pp. 601-608). Oxford: Elsevier.
Hart, C. (2010). Critical discourse analysis and cognitive science: New perspectives on immigration discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Javid, S., & Rahimian, J. (2021). Metaphorical differences between the coronavirus in the headlines of Etemad and Iran newspapers. Rasaneh, 31(4 (121)), 89-100. (In Persian)
Kermani, H., Khorshidi, M., & Araghi Ashtiyani, M. (2021). The president’s speech: An analysis of Covid-19 discourse in the Iranian president’s speeches. Media Studies, 15(4), 112-129. (In Persian)
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2018). Metaphor in media language and cognition: A perspective from conceptual metaphor theory. In Lege artis. Language yesterday, today, tomorrow. The journal of University of SS Cyril and Methodius in Trnava: Vol. III, ((1), pp. 124-141). Warsaw: De Gruyter Open.. https://doi.org/10.2478/lart-2018-0004
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 202-251). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Maliha, H .A. (2021). Inhumanity behind illness with reference to “Illness as Metaphor” and COVID-19 pandemic. Academia Letters, Article 1688. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL1688.
Mozaheb, M. A., & Shahiditabar, M. (2020). Exploring the use of conceptual metaphors in online news about coronavirus in Iran. Letter of Culture and Communications, 4(2), 45-60. (In Persian)    https://doi.org/10.30497/lcc.2020.75544
Panzeri, F., Di Paola, S., & Domaneschi, F. (2021). Does the COVID-19 war metaphor influence reasoning? PLoS ONE, 16(4): e0250651. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250651
Ritchie, D. (2022). Decoding information: The abuse of personification and machine metaphors. In S. Wuppuluri & A. C. Grayling (Eds.), Metaphors and Analogies in Sciences and Humanities: Words and Worlds (pp. 239-252). Cham: Springer.
Sontag, S. (1978). Illness as metaphor. McGraw-Hill Ryerson Ltd.
Sontag, S. (2001). Illness as metaphor and AIDS and its metaphors. New York: Picador.
Tay, D. (2014). Lakoff and the theory of conceptual metaphor. In J. Littlemore & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 49-59). London: Bloomsbury.
Wang, Y. (2021). The metaphors and its critical analysis in COVID-19-related cartoons. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 11(4), 539-554. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2021.114041
Website of Hamshahri Newspaper (2020-2021). https://www.hamshahrionline.ir
Wicke, P., & Bolognesi, M. M. (2020). Framing COVID-19: How we conceptualize and discuss the pandemic on Twitter. PLoS ONE, 15(9): e0240010.
Yalsharzeh, R., & Monsefi, R. (2020). Investigating the discursive encounter of Iran Ministry of Health and Medical Education against the outbreak of coronavirus based on Fairclough’s model of critical discourse analysis. Journal of Researches in Linguistics, 12(1), 153-176. (In Persian)  https://doi.org/10.22108/jrl.2021.126413.1537
Yalsharzeh, R., & Monsefi, R. (2021). “Covid-19” or “the Chinese Virus”? ZABANPAZHUHI, 13(40), 65-87. (In Persian)   https://doi.org/10.22051/jlr.2020.32771.1912