Aldridge-Waddon, M. (2021). Vulnerable witnesses: Vulnerable witnesses in police investigative interviews in England & Wales. In M. Coulthard, A, May & R. Sousa-Silva, (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics (pp. 267-281). Rutledge.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999) Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.
Brennan, M. (1994). Cross-examining children in criminal courts: Child welfare under attack. In J. Gibbons (Ed.), Language and the Law (pp. 199-216). London: Longman.
Clift, R., & Holt, E. (2007). Introduction. In E. Holt & R. Clift (Eds.), Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction (pp. 1-15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cotterill, J. (2004). Collocation, connotation, and courtroom semantics: lawyers’ control of witness testimony through lexical negation. Applied Linguistics, 25(4), 513–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.4.513
DabirMoghaddam. M., & Kalantari R. (2016). An investigation of the information structure of wh-questions in Modern Persian based on text. Literary Text Research, 20(67), 51-83. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22054/ltr.2016.3940
Danet, B. (1980b). Language in the legal process. Law and Society Review, 14(3), 445-564. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053192
Danet, B., Hoffman, K. B., Kermish, N. C., Rafn, H. J., & Stayman, D. (1980). An ethnography of questioning in the courtroom. In R. W. Shuy & A. Shnukal (Eds.), Language Use and the Uses of Language (pp. 222-234). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Drew, P. (1990). Strategies in the contest between lawyer and witness in cross-examination. In J. N. Levi & A. G. Walker (Eds.), Language in the Judicial Process (39-4). New York: Plenum Press.
Drew, P. (1992). Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: the case of a trial for rape. In P. Drew & J. C. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings (pp. 470-520). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Drew, P., & Ferraz de Almeida, F. (2021). Order in court: Talk in interaction in the judicial process. In M. Coulthard, A. May & R. Sousa-Silva (Eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics (pp. 177-191). Rutledge.
Ehrich, S. (2021). Rape victims: The discourse of rape trials. In M, Coulthard, A. May & Rui Sousa- Silva (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics (pp. 297-313). Routledge.
Gibbons, J. (2003) Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system. Oxford: Blackwell.
Haghbin, F., Najafi, P., & Jamali, T. (2016). Narrative and anti-narrative use in legal discourse. Journal of Western Iranian Languages and Dialects, 3(14), 37-59. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22126/jlw.2016.1273
Harris, S. (2005). Telling stories and giving evidence: The hybridisation of narrative and non-narrative modes of discourse in a sexual assault trial. In J. Thornborrow & J. Coates (Eds.), The Sociolinguistics of Narrative (pp. 215-237). Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/sin.6.11har
Heffer, C. (2005). The Language of Jury Trial. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Heffer, C. (2010). Forensic discourse. London and New York: Continuum.
Heydon, G. (2005). The Language of police interviewing: A critical analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Holt, E. J., & Johnson, A. J. (2006). Formulating the facts: Questions and repeats in police/suspect interviews. Paper at International Conference on Conversation Analysis, Helsinki, May 2006.
Holt, E. J., & Johnson, A. J. (2010). Legal talk: Socio-pragmatic aspects of legal talk: police interviews and trial discourse. In M. Coulthard & A. Johnson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics (pp. 17-21). Routledge.
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K. (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jacquemet, M. (1996). Credibility in court: Communicative practices in the Camorra trials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, A. (2002). So … ? Pragmatic implications of so-prefaced questions in formal police interviews. In J. Cotterill (Ed.), Language in the Legal Process (pp. 91-110). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Keane, A., & McKeown, P. (2020). The Modern law of evidence (13th ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representation of discourse referents. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607
Liebes-Plesner, T. (1984). Rhetoric in the service of justice: The sociolinguistic construction of stereotypes in an Israeli rape trial. Text, 4(1-3), 173-192.
Loftus, E. (1979). Eyewitness Testimony. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
May, A., Holt, E., Al Saeed, N., & Ahmad Sani, N. (2021). Legal talk: Socio- pragmatic aspects of legal questioning: police interviews, prosecutorial discourse and trial discourse. In M. Coulthard, A. May & Rui Sousa- Silva (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics (pp. 13-32). Routledge.
Maley, Y., & Fahey, R. (1991). Presenting the evidence: Constructions of reality in court. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 4(10), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01303504
Najafi, P., & Haghbin, F. (2019). Questions usage in interrogation. Journal of Linguistics & Khorasan Dialects, 11(1), 313-333. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22067/lj.v11i1.82798
Najafi, P., & Haghbin, F. (2020). Verbal strategies in interrogation interaction (an investigation in legal discourse). Language Related Research (LRR), 11(4), 391-418. (In Persian) http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23223081.1399.11.4.10.5
O’Barr, W. M. (1982). Linguistic evidence: Language, power and strategy in the courtroom. New York: Academic Press.
Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1991). A cognitive theory of juror decision making: The story model. Cardozo Law Review, 13, 519–557. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.189
Tkacuková, T. (2010). Representing oneself: Cross-examination questioning: lay people as cross-examiners. In M. Coulthard & A. Johnson (Eds.). The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics (pp. 265-281). Routledge.
Tiersma, P. (1999). Legal Language (hbk). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Winter, E. (1994). Clause relations as information structure: Two basic structures in English. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in Written Text Analysis (pp. 46-68). London: Routledge, 46–68.
Woodbury, H. (1984). The strategic use of questions in court. Semiotica, 48(3-4), 197–228. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1984.48.3-4.197