An Optimality Theoretic Analysis of Lenition in Sanandaji Kurdish

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Abstract

Adopting a descriptive-analytic method in the framework of Optimality Theory, this present study aims to analyse the phonological process of lenition, especially spirantisation – a process by which an obstruent becomes a fricative or an approximant- in Kurdish dialect of Sanandaj. In order to gather data, in addition to doing interviews with both female and male speakers of the dialect from different ages, the authors have used their linguistic intuition as a speakers of Sanandaji Kurdish. Analyzing the data demonstrates that spirantisation occurs in all weak positions namely, in onset, coda, and inter-vocalic positions, motivated either by sonority (in two-member coda clusters to conform to the Sonority Sequencing Principle/ Generalization), or assimilating to a neighboring sound with a higher degree of sonority. However, in a special case of lenition in this dialect, changes happen not in the kind of obstruction but in the degree of obstruction of the same phone, though the motivation is still assimilating to a neighboring sound with a higher degree of sonority. 

Keywords

Main Subjects


زاهدی، محمد صدیق (1392). بررسی فرایندهای واجی کردی سنندجی بر اساس واج­شناسی بهینگی. پایان­نامۀ دکتری زبان­شناسی همگانی، دانشگاه اصفهان.
زمانی، محمد و ابراهیم بدخشان (1395). تحلیل و توصیف فرایند نرم­شدگی در زبان کردی (گویش کلهری). زبان­پژوهی، سال هشتم، شمارۀ 19، 89-102.
سجادی، مهدی و عالیه کرد زعفرانلو کامبوزیا (1393). فرایندهای مشترک واجی همخوانی در واژه­های مشترک میان زبان فارسی معیار و زبان هورامی (گویش هورامان تخت). مطالعات زبان و گویش­های غرب ایران، سال اول، شمارۀ 4، 73-100.
کرد زعفرانلو کامبوزیا، عالیه (1382). فرایند تضعیف در زبان فارسی. مجلة دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی مشهد، سال 36، شمارۀ 142، 73-83.
--------------------، الهام ثباتی و فردوس آقاگل­زاده (1394). فرایندهای واجی تضعیف در گونه‌های کردی ایلامی. پژوهش­های زبان­شناسی تطبیقی، دورة 5، شمارة 9، 207-225.
Bye, P. & P. de Lacy (2008). Metrical Influences on Fortition and Lenition. In: J. Carvalho, T. Scheer, and P. Ségéral (Eds.), Lenition and Fortition: Studies in Generative Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Corbin, L., C. (2006). The Phonetics and Phonology of S-Lenition and Vowel Laxing in Eastern Andalusian Spanish. MA Thesis, Williams College, Williamstown, Massachusetts.
File-Muriel, R. J. & E. K. Brown (2010). The Gradient Nature of S-Lenition in Caleño Spanish. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 16 (2), Selected Papers from NWAV 38, 45-55.
Hart, M. S. (2010). Consonant Lenition in Danish. MA Thesis, University of TromsO.
Honeybone, P. (2007). Lenition in English. In: T. Nevalainen, and E. Traugott (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English: Rethinking Approaches to the History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jacobs, H. (1994). Lenition and Optimality Theory. Proceedings of LSRL XXIV, without page number.
Kager, René (1999). Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kirchner, R. (2004). Consonant Lenition. In: B. Hayes, R. Kirchner, and D. Steriade (Eds.), Phonetically Based Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCarthy, J. & A. Prince (1995). Faithfulness and Identity in Prosodic Morphology. In: J. McCarthy (Eds.), Optimality Theory in Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Saadah, Eman (2011). Towards Quantifying Lenition in Ondarroan Basque. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences: Illinois Working Papers, 89-107.
Shin, S. (1999). Consonantal Weakening and Licensing in Optimality Theory. The 13th Pacific Conference on Language, Information and Computation. Taiwan, Textversion, 203-214.
Smith, J. (2007). Markedness, Faithfulness, Positions, and Contexts: Lenition and Fortition in Optimality Theory. In: J. B. de Carvalho, T. Scheer, and P. Ségéral (Eds.), Lenition and Fortition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Zahedi, M. S., B. Alinezhad & V. Rezai (2012). The Sonority Sequencing Principle in Sanandaji/Erdelani Kurdish: An Optimality Theoretical Perspective. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2 (5), 72-84.