Constraints on the Productivity of Denominal and Deadjectival Verbs in Standard Farsi

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Tarbiat Modares University

2 Tarbiat modares university

Abstract

The present research aims to investigate constraints on the productivity of denominal verbs and deadjectival verbs in Standard Farsi. Also, the relation between transparency and productivity of this verb pattern is considered. The study method is descriptive-analytic and the data collection is corpus-based. For this purpose, a list of 90 respective verbs from a self-made written corpus including 824000 words and also a spoken corpus which is recorded from daily conversations of Persian speakers are provided. The token frequency of these verbs in written and spoken corpus is respectively 1700 and 775. Studies show that these verbs do not select vowel-ending words as their base. Also, most of the bases for such verbs are monosyllabic and few are disyllabic. About the morphological constraints it should be noted that, among different word categories only nouns and adjectives are used as the base for these verbs. But the main factor restricting the productivity of such verbs is blocking in which synonymous compound verbs block the construction of equivalent simple verbs. Despite the structural constraints mentioned, which block the construction of potential verbs with this pattern, pragmatic constraint has a substantial role in refusal of actual verbs by language users. Also, about the relation between transparency and productivity it is found that semantic transparency have no effect on the productivity of these verbs.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

افراشی، آزیتا (1378). نگاهی به شفافیت و تیرگی در سطح واژه‌های مرکب. متن‌پژوهی ادبی، شمارۀ 9 و10، 61-74.
صادقی، علی اشرف (1349). تحول افعال بی­قاعدۀ زبان فارسی. جستارهای ادبی، شمارۀ 24، 791-801.
------------- (1380). دربارۀ فعل­های جعلی. در: علی اشرف صادقی، مسائل تاریخی زبان فارسی (صص 143-152). تهران: سخن.
طباطبائی، علاءالدین (1381). فعل بسیط و مرکب در زبان فارسی. تهران: دانش.
منصوری، یدالله (1382). بررسی ساختار فعل­های جعلی در فارسی میانه و فارسی دری. نامۀ فرهنگستان، شمارۀ 22، 108-124.
نجفی، ابوالحسن (1387). فارسی سترون یا زایا؟. سخنرانی در شهر کتاب تهران. وبگاه پرواز پروانه.
Baayen, H. (1992). Quantitative Aspects of Morphological Productivity. In Yearbook 
of morphology 1991 1991 (pp. 109-149). Springer Netherlands.
Bauer, L. (1983). ). English Word-Formation. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
----------- (2001). ). Morphological productivity Productivity(Vol. 95). Cambridge: . Cambridge University Press.
Bhatia, V. K., (1993): Analysing Genre -- Language Use in Professional Settings., London:, Longman, Applied Linguistics and Language Study Series.
Cooper, W. E. (1975). On Constraining the Production of Denominal Verbs. Foundations of Language, , 12(3). 397-399.
Crystal, D. (2011). ). Dictionary of Linguistics and phonetics Phonetics(Vol. 30). John Wiley & Sons.
Dayley, J. P. (1985). ). Tzutujil grammar Grammar(Vol. 107). University of California Press.
De Haas, W. & M. Trommelen, M. (1993). ). Morfologisch Handboek van het Nederlands: een Overzicht van de woordvorming Woordvorming(Vol. 7). SDU Uitgeverij.
Frauenfelder, U., & R. Schreuder, R. (1991). Constraining Psycholinguistic Models of Processing and Representation: the Role of Productivity.
Haspelmath, M., & A. Sims, A. (2010). Understanding Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hewitt, B. G. (1979). ). Abkhaz Abkhaz(Vol. 2). Routledge Kegan & Paul.
Jovanović, V. Ž. (2003). On Productivity. Creativity and Restrictions on Word Conversion in English. Facta Universitatis-Series: Linguistics and Literature, 2(10), 425-436.
Levin, B., & M. Rappaport Hovav , M. R. (2005). ). Argument Realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Löwenadler, J. (2010). Restrictions on Productivity: Defectiveness in Swedish Adjective Paradigms.  Morphology,  20(1). 71-107.
Marchand, H. (1969). The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation: A Synchronic-Diachronic Approach. Beck.
Plag, I. (1999). ). Morphological Productivity: Structural Constraints in English derivation Derivation(Vol. 28). Walter de Gruyter.
----------- (2003). ). Word-Formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
----------- (2004). Productivity. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd Ed., Elsevier.
Plank, F. (1981). Morphologische (Ir-) Regularitäten.  Tübingen: Narr.
Rainer F. (1988). toward a Theory of Blocking, in Geert Booj and Jap van Marle (Eeds.) Yearbook of Morphology. Dordrecht_ Boston_ London: Kluwer.
----------- (2005) Constraints on Productivity. In: Pavol Štekauer and Rochelle Lieber (Eds.), Handbook of Word-Formation, 335–352. Dordrecht: Springer.
Rose, J. H. (1973). Principled Limitations on Productivity in Denominal Verbs.  Foundations of Language, 509-526.
Švedova, N. J. E. (Ed.). (1980). ). Russkaja Grammatika. Nauka.
Research in Western Iranian Languages and Dialects
Volume 6, Issue 20
June 2018
Pages 109-132

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics