Semantic Change of the Word “dowlat” in Persian: A Study based on Prototype Theory

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Payme-noor

2 Payme-Noor

Abstract

In this paper we investigated the semantic change of the word “dowlat” in the history of Persian prose from the 4th century (Hijri) until now. Though seemingly the meaning of this word has not changed dramatically, but it has been used with 21 different meanings in the Persian texts we investigated. We made an attempt to explain the semantic change of Dowlat using the prototype theory, Geeraerts’ (1997) approach. The prototype theory explains the meaning changes of the word well, in terms of three of four prototype hypotheses. We found that some senses play central role in the process of meaning change and meaning changes take place in the margins of clusters, in relation to central senses; some senses are peripheral and more impermanent; and some senses root simultaneously from more than one conceptual cluster (hypothesis 2). We found some evidence which show that modulation in the boundaries could cause one sense to occur twice in the history of the word in question, and each time independent from the other one; that is to say semantic polygenesis (hypothesis 3). Finally we learnt that encyclopedic information has a significant role in conceptual development of the words (hypothesis 4).
 

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

صفوی، کورش (1384). فرهنگ توصیفی معنی‌شناسی. تهران: فرهنگ معاصر.
----------- (1393). پیشگفتار مترجم. در: دیرک گیررتس. نظریه‌های معنی‌شناسی واژگانی، (صص 13-16). تهران: علمی.
فن، ک. ت. (1381). مفهوم فلسفه نزد ویتگنشتاین. مترجم: کامران قره گزلی. تهران: نشر مرکز.
گیرارتز، دیرک (1393). نظریه‌های معنی‌شناسی واژگانی. مترجم: کورش صفوی. تهران: علمی.
Coleman, L. & P. Kay (1981). Prototype Semantics: The English Word Le. Language, 57 (1), 26-44.
Deo, A. (2015). Diachronic Semantics. Annual Review of Linguistics, 1 (1), 179-197.
Geeraerts, D. (1983). Prototype Theory and Diachronic Semantics: A Case Study. Indogermanische Forschungen, 88, 1-32.
------------------- (1997). Diachronic Prototype Semantics: A Contribution to Historical Lexicology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
------------------- (1999). Diachronic Prototype Semantics: A Digest. In: A. Black & P. Coch (Eds.), Historical Semantics and Cognition, (pp. 91-107). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter
------------------- (2006). Prospects and Problems of Prototype Theory. In: D. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings, (pp. 141-165). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Janda, L. A. (2015). Cognitive Linguistics in the Year 2015. Cognitive Semantics, 1, 131-154.
Rosch, E. (1973). On the Internal Structure of Perceptual and Semantic Categories. In: T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language. (pp. 111-114).
------------- (1975). Cognitive Representation of Semantic Categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 104 (3), 192-233.
------------- (1978). Principles of Categorization. In: E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and Categorization, (pp. 27-48). Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.
------------- & C. B. Mervis (1975). Family Resemblances: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7 (4), 573-605.
Thomasson, A. (2016). Categories. In: E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 17 Aug. 2017, from: <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/ entries/categories/>.
Wardy, R. (1998). Categories. In: The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Taylor and Francis. Retrieved 17 Aug. 2017, from: https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/ thematic/categories/v-1
Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical Investigations. Translated by: G. E. M. Anscombe, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Research in Western Iranian Languages and Dialects
Volume 6, Issue 21
July 2018
Pages 77-97

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics