A Comparative Study of Central Kurdish, Persian, and English Kinship Terms

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 instructor, English department, Islamic Azad University, Saqqez

2 assistant professor, Farhangian university, Sanandaj, Iran

Abstract

The present research is a comparative study on Central Kurdish (also known as Sorani), Persian, and English kinship terms based on the ideas put forward by universalist anthropologists who believe in the existence of an underlying uniform, universal structure under the apparent diversity in kinship systems and claim that all kinship relations, from the simplest to the most complicated, are based on the nuclear family which is extended through a linking relative who knits two families together. To describe and study all kinship systems, these anthropologists propose a universal set of criteria. Each language, according to its cultural features, uses some of these criteria. The aim of this study was to find, based on principles and methods of universal anthropology, an answer to the question of what criteria do Kurdish people use to categorize their kin? As a result, we found out that Kurdish uses the five criteria of consanguinity-affinity, gender, generation, side of the family and relative age while Farsi makes use of consanguinity-affinity, gender, generation and side of the family; and English utilizes consanguinity-affinity, gender, and generation. Additionally, although English belongs to the Eskimo kinship system, both Farsi and Kurdish are classified under the Sudanese system.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

باطنی، محمدرضا (1354). اصطلاحات خویشاوندی در زبان فارسی. در: مسائل زبان‎شناسی نوین (صص 157-174). تهران: آگاه.
ترادگیل، پیتر (1376). زبان‎شناسی اجتماعی. مترجم: محمد طباطبایی. تهران: آگه.
عباسی، بیستون (1392). بررسی واژگان خویشاوندی هورامی بر اساس معیارهای مورداک. فصلنامة مطالعات زبان و گویش‎های غرب ایران، 1 (2)، 31-55.
Burling, R. (1970). Man's Many Voices: Language in Its Cultural Context. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Fischer, M. (2010). Representing Anthropological Knowledge: Calculating Kinship. In: http://www.era.anthropology.ac.uk/EraResources /Era/Kinship /index. html&handle =sosig1136990860-16750
Foley, W. (1997). Anthropological Linguistics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hudson, R. (1996). Sociolinguistics. 2nd edition. Cambridge: CUP.
O'Neil, D. (2008). Kinship: An Introduction to Descent Systems and Family Organization. Sans Marcos: Palomar College. In: http://anthro.palomar. edu/kinship/default.htm.
Lounsbury, F. (1965). Another View of the Trobriand Kinship Categories. In: E. Hammel, (Ed.), Formal Semantic Analysis, (pp. 142-185). Washington: American Anthropological Association.
Read, D. (2001). What Is Kinship? In: http://fasnafan.tripod.com/kinship.
Turin, M. (2001). Call Me Uncle: An Outsider's Experience of Nepali Kinship. Contributions to Nepalese Studies, 28, 277-283.
Wardhaugh, R. (2006). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. 5th Edition. UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Research in Western Iranian Languages and Dialects
Volume 6, Issue 21
July 2018
Pages 1-19

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics