Language Maintenance or Shift in Gilan-e Gharb: Exploring Linguistic Attitudes of Kalhuri Kurdish Speakers

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 M.A. in Linguistics, Department of English Language and Linguistics, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor in Linguistics, Department of English Language and Linguistics, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.

چکیده

The present study aims to explore the current status of the Kalhuri Kurdish variety in Gilan-e Gharb and to determine the factors that contribute to its maintenance or shift. Adopting a qualitative research design, the study employed the focus group interview method. The participants consisted of 24 native speakers of Kalhuri Kurdish, aged 22 to 55 years, who were purposively selected from three age groups. Following the audio recording and transcription of the interviews, the data were examined using thematic analysis. The findings indicated that although Kalhuri Kurdish continued to be used in family interactions, everyday communication, and informal settings in Gilan-e Gharb, its use had declined among younger generations, particularly in educational, occupational, and formal communicative contexts, where it was increasingly being replaced by Persian. Moreover, factors such as the role of the family, the influence of educational institutions, and sociocultural pressures exerted by the dominant language played a significant role in the process of language shift. Based on these findings, strengthening linguistic identity, raising awareness through education and media, and providing institutional support for linguistic diversity are identified as effective strategies for the maintenance and revitalization of this linguistic variety. The study underscores the necessity of developing targeted and sustainable language policies to support indigenous languages in multilingual contexts.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Language Maintenance or Shift in Gilan-e Gharb: Exploring Linguistic Attitudes of Kalhuri Kurdish Speakers

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hosna Pourmehr 1
  • Kourosh Saberi 2
1 M.A. in Linguistics, Department of English Language and Linguistics, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor in Linguistics, Department of English Language and Linguistics, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The present study aims to explore the current status of the Kalhuri Kurdish variety in Gilan-e Gharb and to determine the factors that contribute to its maintenance or shift. Adopting a qualitative research design, the study employed the focus group interview method. The participants consisted of 24 native speakers of Kalhuri Kurdish, aged 22 to 55 years, who were purposively selected from three age groups. Following the audio recording and transcription of the interviews, the data were examined using thematic analysis. The findings indicated that although Kalhuri Kurdish continued to be used in family interactions, everyday communication, and informal settings in Gilan-e Gharb, its use had declined among younger generations, particularly in educational, occupational, and formal communicative contexts, where it was increasingly being replaced by Persian. Moreover, factors such as the role of the family, the influence of educational institutions, and sociocultural pressures exerted by the dominant language played a significant role in the process of language shift. Based on these findings, strengthening linguistic identity, raising awareness through education and media, and providing institutional support for linguistic diversity are identified as effective strategies for the maintenance and revitalization of this linguistic variety. The study underscores the necessity of developing targeted and sustainable language policies to support indigenous languages in multilingual contexts.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • language maintenance
  • language shift
  • linguistic attitudes
  • Gilan-e Gharb
  • Kalhuri Kurdish

مراجع

Alafifi, E. (2025). Heritage language maintenance among second-generation Hispanic immigrants: The role of settlement context and community support in bilingualism. Transcultural Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(2), 132–144. https://doi.org/10.21608/tjhss.2025.311360.1257
Androutsopoulos, J. (2014). Computer-mediated communication and linguistic landscapes. In M. Petrucci, J. Androutsopoulos, & M. Sebba (Eds.), Semiotic landscapes: Language, image, space (pp. 74–91). Continuum.
Azizi, M., Saberi, K., & Moradkhani, S. (2024). Examining language attitudes of speakers toward Kurdish, Kermanshahi Persian, and Standard Persian in Kermanshah city using the sound-matching test. Research in Western Iranian Languages and Dialects, 12(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.22126/jlw.2023.8847.1688 [in Persian]
Baker, C. (1992). Attitudes and language. Multilingual Matters.
Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power (J. B. Thompson, Ed.; G. Raymond & M. Adamson, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Britannica. (n.d.). Kurdish language. In Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved February 1, 2026, from https://www.britannica.com/topic/Kurdish-language
Bromham, L., Dinnage, R., Skirgard, H., Ritchie, M., Cardillo, M., Meakins, F., & Greenhill, S. J. (2022). Global predictors of language endangerment and the future of linguistic diversity. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 6, 163–173.
Crystal, D. (2000). Language death. Cambridge University Press.
Eberhard, D. M., Simons, G. F., & Fennig, C. D. (Eds.). (2025). Ethnologue: Languages of the world (28th ed.). SIL International.
Edwards, J. (2009). Language and identity: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Farmahini Farahani, E., & Abolhasani Chimeh, Z. (2019). Examining the relationship between native speakers’ attitudes and the level of language endangerment based on the UNESCO framework. Elm-e Zaban (Language Science), 6(9), 305–332. https://doi.org/10.22054/ls.2019.41121.1209 [In Persian]
Fishman, J. A. (1991). Reversing language shift: Theoretical and empirical foundations of assistance to threatened languages. Multilingual Matters.
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. Edward Arnold.
Garrett, P. (2010). Attitudes to language. Cambridge University Press.
Giles, H., Bourhis, R. Y., & Taylor, D. M. (1977). Towards a theory of language in ethnic group relations. In H. Giles (Ed.), Language, ethnicity and intergroup relations (pp. 307–348). Academic Press.
Grenoble, L. A., & Whaley, L. J. (2006). Saving languages: An introduction to language revitalization. Cambridge University Press.
Haig, G., & Öpengin, E. (2018). Kurdish languages. In L. Haig & G. Khan (Eds.), The languages and linguistics of Western Asia: An areal perspective (pp. 475–516). De Gruyter Mouton.
Harrison, K. D. (2007). When languages die: The extinction of the world’s languages and the erosion of human knowledge. Oxford University Press.
Heller, M. (2007). Bilingualism: A social approach. Palgrave Macmillan.
Hornberger, N. H., & King, K. A. (1996). Language revitalization in the Andes: Can the schools reverse language shift? Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 17(6), 427–441.
Kedrebeogo, G. (1998). Language maintenance and language shift in Burkina Faso: The case of the Koromba. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 28(2).
Leonard, W. Y. (2023). Refusing “endangered languages” narratives. Daedalus, 152(3), 69–83.
Melaku, Z., & Semu, S. (2023). Language maintenance and shift in Diraytata. Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching (JLLLT), 2(2), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.37249/jlllt.v2i2.565
Mirvahedi, S. H. (2016). The role of families in language maintenance (The case of Azerbaijani in Tabriz). Language and Linguistics, 12(23), 1–16. [In Persian]
Moddaresi, Y., & Bashirnejad, H. (2006). Why and how do languages die? Zaban va Adab (Language and Literature, University of Tabriz), 9(30), 86–120. https://doi.org/10.22054/ltr.2007.6386 [In Persian]
Rosenberg, M. J., & Hovland, C. I. (1960). Cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of attitudes. Yale University Press.
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2000). Linguistic genocide in education—or worldwide diversity and human rights? Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. Cambridge University Press.
Statistical Centre of Iran. (2017). Census of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 1395 (2016). Gilan-e Gharb County and Gilan-e Gharb city population figures. Retrieved from the English Wikipedia summaries based on official census data
Thomason, S. G., & Kaufman, T. (1988). Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. University of California Press.
UNESCO. (2003). Language vitality and endangerment. UNESCO.
Weinreich, U. (1968). Languages in contact: Findings and problems. Mouton.
Zahrakar, K. (2013). Linguistic convergence and change in the Luri language and the importance of lexeme selection in its revival, maintenance, and expansion (with emphasis on the Feyli dialect). In Proceedings of the National Conference on the Evolution of Luristani Local Literature (Kallebad). Retrieved from SID: https://sid.ir/paper/818865/fa [In Persian]
مطالعات زبان‌ها و گویش‌های غرب ایران
دوره 14، شماره 2
تیر 1405
صفحه 19-30

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار